Friday, May 11, 2012

Final grades and best wishes


Final grades and best wishes

Your final grades and all their component scores are now accessible from the Blackboard "My Grades" tab.(See note** below.) If you did not receive credit for an assignment you completed, please let the TAs know right away.  If you're just realizing now that you have no clicker points, email me directly at fogelman@albany.edu and include your class time and clicker number.

I enjoyed teaching you and invite you to keep me abreast of the successes and challenges you encounter in the future. The TAs and course clerks join me in wishing you an enjoyable summer and a future of good health and prosperity. Special best wishes to those of you who are graduating this semester.

I’m in my office most of the time when school is in session and often during breaks, and you are always welcome to come in to discuss topics from the course or other matters. It’s usually best to call first, especially during the summer months or other school vacations. You'll want to make an appointment or at least call first if you want to meet with me next Monday through Wednesday.  I'll be away from the office for several days starting next Thursday.

ANSWER SHEETS: I plan to dispose of all unreturned 1a, 2a, and 3a exams at the end of the month. The papers include students' names, grades, and Albany IDs. In order to protect your privacy, I send it to a secure off-campus disposal facility. If you’d rather handle these documents yourself, either come in soon and pick them out or email me a request to hold them for you until it is convenient for you to come and get them.

(As a privacy advocate, I instituted this policy years ago to protect people's Social Security numbers. Nobody took me up on it then, nor has anyone done so since we changed to local ID's. Still, if you want your in-term exams and scantrons and neglected to get them when I returned them in class, you are invited to request them.)

I may post one last message on this BMgt341-L distribution list before it expires later this month.

Again, my best to you always.

Prof. M. Fogelman

**Note on students’ Blackboard --> My Grades listing: Exam average is calculated using Exam 1, Exam 2 and Exam 3 values.  Each of these is the higher score of a pair, 1a/1b, 2a/2b, and 3a/3b, respectively.  Also, please ignore the "points possible" column, as Blackboard's system logic is cannot accommodate my practice of selecting the higher of two grades.

If you wish to recheck your final grade on your own...

Average the higher of each pair exams 1a/1b, 2a/2b, and 3a/3b (listed on MyGrades as exams 1, 2, and 3).


  • Start with 75% of the average of exams 1, 2, and 3.
  • Add your clicker-based course points (10% of your total clicks up to a maximum of 15)
  • Add your total assignment (Blackboard Contribution) points (0-10)
  • Add your hotseat points  (0, 2.5, or 5.0)

Round any final numeric total ending in .50 or higher  up to the next whole number.

Look up the final numeric total you just calculated on the chart at the bottom of page 3 of the course syllabus. (html version can be accessed via Blackboard)





Thursday, May 10, 2012

Final grades currently suppressed


Final grades currently suppressed
Some calculated grade values have been suppressed and will not be accessible for about a full day or possibly longer.

I prevent students from accessing these results during this change period in order to prevent confusion while final exam grades 1b, 2b, and 3b are being uploaded and their associated term averages and letter grades recalculated and posted.

There will be an announcement here when your final, post-exam grades are finished and viewable by  students.

Best...mf

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Some final 1b, 2b, and 3b items and final exam instructions


Some final 1b, 2b, and 3b items and final exam instructions
**************************************************


B Mgt 341 Final Exam Room Assignments

The exam will be given Thursday, May 10
from 8:00-10:00 a.m.
(Students needing extra time may arrive at 7:30)
Section 4667 (8:45 class ) A through K in LC-5
Section 4667 (8:45 class ) L through Z in LC-6
Section 3341 (10:15 class) should go to LC-7
 

A few questions i've had and helpful hints associated with them:

Exam 1b:

Q: Is Hofstede a folk hero? What should we know about his national culture framework?
A: Yes, he's a folk hero, and you should be able to recognize what he means by the 5 dimensions that make up his framework: masculinity/femininity, individualism/collectivism, etc.

Hofstede's Framework for Assessing Culture

Hofstede has found five dimensions of culture in his study of national work related values. Replication studies have yielded similar results, pointing to stability of the dimensions across time. The dimensions are:

Small vs. large power distance
How much the less powerful members of institutions and organizations expect and accept that power is distributed unequally. In cultures with small power distance (e.g. Australia, Austria, Denmark, Ireland, New Zealand), people expect and accept power relations that are more consultative or democratic. People relate to one another more as equals regardless of formal positions. Subordinates are more comfortable with and demand the right to contribute to and critique the decisions of those in power. In cultures with large power distance (e.g. Malaysia), the less powerful accept power relations that are autocratic or paternalistic. Subordinates acknowledge the power of others based on their formal, hierarchical positions. Thus, Small vs. Large Power Distance does not measure or attempt to measure a culture's objective, "real" power distribution, but rather the way people perceive power differences.



Individualism vs. collectivism
How much members of the culture define themselves apart from their group memberships. In individualist cultures, people are expected to develop and display their individual personalities and to choose their own affiliations. In collectivist cultures, people are defined and act mostly as a member of a long-term group, such as the family, a religious group, an age cohort, a town, or a profession, among others. This dimension was found to move towards the individualist end of the spectrum with increasing national wealth.



Masculinity vs. femininity
The value placed on traditionally male or female values (as understood in most Western cultures). In so-called 'masculine' cultures, people (whether male or female) value competitiveness, assertiveness, ambition, and the accumulation of wealth and material possessions. In so-called 'feminine' cultures, people (again whether male or female) value relationships and quality of life. This dimension is often renamed by users of Hofstede's work, e.g. to Quantity of Life vs. Quality of Life. Another reading of the same dimension holds that in 'M' cultures, the differences between gender roles are more dramatic and less fluid than in 'F' cultures; but this strongly depends on other dimensions as well.


Weak vs. strong uncertainty avoidance
How much members of a society are anxious about the unknown, and as a consequence, attempt to cope with anxiety by minimizing uncertainty. In cultures with strong uncertainty avoidance, people prefer explicit rules (e.g. about religion and food) and formally structured activities, and employees tend to remain longer with their present employer. In cultures with weak uncertainty avoidance, people prefer implicit or flexible rules or guidelines and informal activities. Employees tend to change employers more frequently.


Michael Harris Bond and his collaborators subsequently found a fifth dimension which was initially called Confucian dynamism. Hofstede later incorporated this into his framework as:

Long vs. short term orientation
A society's "time horizon," or the importance attached to the future versus the past and present. In long term oriented societies, people value actions and attitudes that affect the future: persistence/perseverance, thrift, and shame. In short term oriented societies, people value actions and attitudes that are affected by the past or the present: normative statements, immediate stability, protecting one's own face, respect for tradition, and reciprocation of greetings, favors, and gifts.


These cultural differences describe averages or tendencies and not characteristics of individuals. A Japanese person for example can have a very low 'uncertainty avoidance' compared to a Filipino person even though their 'national' cultures point strongly in a different direction. Consequently, a country's scores should not be interpreted as deterministic.


Exam 2b:

Q: What do we have to know about expectancy theory, and is Vroom a folk hero?
A: Vroom's not a folk hero, but you should understand what expectancy, instrumentality, and valence mean in that context and how they combine as factors in motivation.


Q: What do we need to know about the "psychological contract"?
A: Understand what it is and how it's applied--both the "traditional" psy contract and what I referred to in class and the notes as the "modern version" (the one I sometimes associate with Jack Welch), which looks at loyalty in a different way from how the traditional version looks at it.



Exam 3b:




Q:  Question 30 on Exam 3a was marked as correct for all answers, but they are not all correct.  Why?
A:  They were all graded as correct because I felt the question was too obscure to ask without letting everyone know I might ask it. I'm reminding everyone now that you do need to recognize these political tactics and remember which is most and least frequently used in organizations--according to the research reviewed in the text.

Q: Do we need to know the steps to the rational decision making process?  (There are 4 in the text and 6 in the notes.)
A: Yes you do, and the 4 in the text are the same as the 5 in the notes.  You don't have to know the 6th step from Dr. Ken, as that applies in particular to the strict data-based method used in his business.


Q: What do we need to know about the group development stages? (storming, norming, etc.)
A: Just have a good idea what happens during each stage, as we discussed in class. A more detailed discussion, from Wikipedia, follows:

Tuckman's Group Development Model


Forming
In the first stages of team building, the forming of the team takes place. The individual's behavior is driven by a desire to be accepted by the others, and avoid controversy or conflict. Serious issues and feelings are avoided, and people focus on being busy with routines, such as team organization, who does what, when to meet, etc. But individuals are also gathering information and impressions - about each other, and about the scope of the task and how to approach it. This is a comfortable stage to be in, but the avoidance of conflict and threat means that not much actually gets done.

The team meets and learns about the opportunities and challenges, and then agrees on goals and begins to tackle the tasks. Team members tend to behave quite independently. They may be motivated but are usually relatively uninformed of the issues and objectives of the team. Team members are usually on their best behavior but very focused on themselves. Mature team members begin to model appropriate behavior even at this early phase. Sharing the knowledge of the concept of "Teams - Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing" is extremely helpful to the team.
Supervisors of the team tend to need to be directive during this phase.

The forming stage of any team is important because, in this stage, the members of the team get to know one another, exchange some personal information, and make new friends. This is also a good opportunity to see how each member of the team works as an individual and how they respond to pressure.

Storming
Every group will next enter the storming stage in which different ideas compete for consideration. The team addresses issues such as what problems they are really supposed to solve, how they will function independently and together and what leadership model they will accept. Team members open up to each other and confront each other's ideas and perspectives. In some cases storming can be resolved quickly. In others, the team never leaves this stage. The maturity of some team members usually determines whether the team will ever move out of this stage. Some team members will focus on minutiae to evade real issues.

The storming stage is necessary to the growth of the team. It can be contentious, unpleasant and even painful to members of the team who are averse to conflict. Tolerance of each team member and their differences should be emphasized. Without tolerance and patience the team will fail. This phase can become destructive to the team and will lower motivation if allowed to get out of control. Some teams will never develop past this stage.

Supervisors of the team during this phase may be more accessible, but tend to remain directive in their guidance of decision-making and professional behavior. The team members will therefore resolve their differences and members will be able to participate with one another more comfortably. The ideal is that they will not feel that they are being judged, and will therefore share their opinions and views.

Norming
The team manages to have one goal and come to a mutual plan for the team at this stage. Some may have to give up their own ideas and agree with others in order to make the team function. In this stage, all team members take the responsibility and have the ambition to work for the success of the team's goals.

Performing
It is possible for some teams to reach the performing stage. These high-performing teams are able to function as a unit as they find ways to get the job done smoothly and effectively without inappropriate conflict or the need for external supervision. By this time, they are motivated and knowledgeable. The team members are now competent, autonomous and able to handle the decision-making process without supervision. Dissent is expected and allowed as long as it is channeled through means acceptable to the team.

Supervisors of the team during this phase are almost always participative. The team will make most of the necessary decisions. Even the most high-performing teams will revert to earlier stages in certain circumstances. Many long-standing teams go through these cycles many times as they react to changing circumstances. For example, a change in leadership may cause the team to revert to storming as the new people challenge the existing norms and dynamics of the team.

Adjourning …
In 1977, Tuckman, jointly with Mary Ann Jensen, added a fifth stage to the 4 stages: adjourning, that involves completing the task and breaking up the team.



FINAL EXAM COVER SHEET




-------------------------------------- ,  ----------------------------------------
Printed Last Name, First Name

B Mgt 341 – 5/10/2012 - Finals 1b, 2b, 3b


REMOVING ANY QUESTION SHEET FROM THE EXAMINATION ROOM WILL RESULT IN A FAILING COURSE GRADE AND JUDICIAL ACTION!!!

1.   Pick up answer sheets as you exchange your picture id for this question sheet packet. ALL FINAL EXAMS IN THIS PACKET ARE VERSION 1!!!.
2.   Go to your seat and place your belongings on the floor.  All that should remain on your desk are your pencils and a seat assignment card, if you received one.
3.   Write one of the following six section identification lines across the top of side one of each answer sheet you use:

Section 4667 (8:45) ***CORRECTED***
4667     Exam 1b (5)
4667     Exam 2b (6)
 4667     Exam 3b (7)

Section 3341 (10:15) ***CORRECTED***
3341     Exam 1b (5)

3341     Exam 2b (6)

3341     Exam 3b (7)

4.   Answer the exam questions on 1b, 2b and/or 3b in any order you like, selecting the best answer for each question.
5.   When you are completely finished, stand up, put your pencils away, retrieve your belongings, and go to the back of the room.
6.   Place your answer sheets in the appropriate file boxes or piles (1b, 2b, and 3b).
7. Exchange this question sheet packet for your ID card before leaving.
Please read and sign the following declaration:  I understand that I may review my exam by appointment until noon on Tuesday, May 15, and I may initiate an appeal of final exam questions through Wednesday, May 16.  Outside of normal class and online materials, I obtained no advance knowledge of any questions.  Missing or incorrect entries for (1) my ID number, (2) my name, or (3) the exam version number may cause that exam grade to be reduced by 3 points.        _____________________________________ Signed

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Pre-exam "final" grades are posted



 Pre-exam "final" grades are posted

Your grades are all posted and released, and they should reflect most grade book corrections requested via mgt341ga@yahoo.com up to this point. Excellent work on the part of our teaching assistants and the test scoring office has enabled us to score and post the exam 3a grades and publish all this information so quickly.

Students should not delay in identifying any unaccounted for hotseat credit, assignment point, or other grade components.

With the exception of clicker points, all grade recording problems should be addressed to the TAs before 5/10 at mgt341ga@yahoo.com. Email me personally at fogelman@albany.edu regarding any clicker point questions you have.  If you are one of the small number of people who have failed to check the weekly clicker points report and just now discover you have no clicker credit, EMAIL ME YOUR CLICKER NUMBER AND CLASS TIME.  I will look up how many points that clicker earned and instruct the TAs to post your credit.  Of course, students and former students are always welcome to contact me regarding concerns associated with this course or any other matter.

(The column named "B Clicker points to add" reflects 0.10 course points per click up to a maximum of 15.00 course points for students who registered 150 or more clicks. There were 170 all together. Column “C Blackboard Contribution” includes your total points on assignments 1-10. )

Your actual earned grade appears in the row titled “E Raw Term Grade (A+B+C+D).

Following this raw term grade is a column labeled “Final Letter Grade.” It displays the letter grade you have earned up to the point. 

A FINAL GRADE SHOULD CHANGE ONLY IF SOMETHING OCCURS TO INCREASE ONE OR MORE OF ITS COMPONENTS, THE MOST LIKELY REASON BEING IMPROVED PERFORMANCE ON ONE, TWO OR THREE OF THE "SECOND CHANCE" FINALS TO BE GIVEN ON THURSDAY, MAY 10 AT 8 A.M. Since students could earn up to 30.0 “free” points in addition to an extra five points on each exam--and given the fact that you get another chance to demonstrate your knowledge on any or all 3 exam segments--there is no point asking for a higher letter grade if your new one falls just short of the next cutoff point. In many cases, the letter grade awarded is already an interval higher than the one you would have earned if exams and course grades had been based on 100% instead of 105%.

SOME CALCULATED GRADE VALUES WILL NOT BE VIEWABLE FOR SEVERAL HOURS SOMETIME(S) BETWEEN MAY 10 AND MAY 14. I SUPPRESS THESE RESULTS AT THAT TIME IN ORDER TO PREVENT CONFUSION WHILE FINAL EXAM GRADES 1b, 2b, AND 3b ARE BEING UPLOADED AND THEIR ASSOCIATED TERM AVERAGES AND LETTER GRADES RECALCULATED.

If you want to verify the grade calculations, you can run the numbers yourself using the formula first suggested when we reviewed page 3 of our syllabus during session #1:

Compute your Actual Term Grade by totaling these four numbers…
   75% of your exam average, plus
   Total assignment points (maximum = 10), plus
   Hotseat points (generally 0 or 5), plus
   Total clicker points times .01 (to a maximum of 15.00).

Locate your total on this table, from page 3 of the course syllabus you received on January 19:
Grades:
       92-100+
A

77-79
C+
90-91
A-

73-76
C
87-89
B+

70-72
C-
83-86
B

60-69
D
80-82
B-

Below 60
E


As was noted early on and throughout the semester, final grade percents ending in .5 or higher--not .4999--are rounded up to the next whole number.  

Good luck to those who will be taking our final (Exams 1b, 2b, and/or 3b). If I won't be seeing  you in our last classes or at the exam—THURSDAY, MAY 10 at 8 a.m.—I wish you the best in your other courses and all your future endeavors.

Prof. M. Fogelman

Final exam at 8 a.m. Thurs May 10


B Mgt 341 Final Exam Room Assignments

The exam will be given Thursday, May 10
from 8:00-10:00 a.m.
(Students needing extra time may arrive at 7:30)
Section 4667 (8:45 class ) A through K in LC-5
Section 4667 (8:45 class ) L through Z in LC-6
Section 3341 (10:15 class) should go to LC-7

Monday, April 30, 2012

Regarding Exam 3a...


Some good questions and answers follow...
 
I probably won't be taking questions much later tonight.  If you have something to ask, please send it soon.  best of luck tomw...mf
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Can you explain to me the basics of the Ohio state and Michigan studies and they key ideas to focus on?

I'm glad to answer a more specific question.  The key ideas are mainly what's on the slides--especially the session 27 review slide.  If something's unclear in any slides--and in that section of the chapter--ask away.  (You can ask me more than just one or two questions, if necessary.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------

I'm having a hard time recalling what caused people to resist from TQM approach in the Michigan study. Could you offer some insight onto this matter? Thanks

Among the reasons people resist team management, and in this TQM implementation...
Generalized fear and individualist culture
Mistrust of the process (just a management scheme to get us working harder?)
Peer Pressure
Disruption of traditions or relationships (doctors "trained" by pharmacists, etc.)
Lack of Tact and/or poor training
Non-reinforcing reward systems (they often need changing, esp. in a self-managed team situation)


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Groups and teamwork
Q1: How does a team differ from a committee or task force? Is the answer "A team emphasizes performance?"

Yes, that’s correct, though I won’t be asking questions that have you distinguish between teams and other groups.  You will be differentiating among different types of teams, however.


Q2: According to research on self-managed teams, self-managed teams had__?A positive effect on productivity or  a positive effect on specifics relating to self-management.

That is the correct answer.  Make sure you know all the specifics in the chapter section headed “effectiveness of self-managed teams.”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You gave us several examples of groupthink and the session 21 speaker had some others using optimzing and evidence-based decision making.  Are there any important examples of brainstorming or other group problem solving techniques?

The "Deep Dive" in the session 23 video is the only one we actually covered in any detail.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do we need to know the new penalties as you changed them when you updated the slide on the foreign corrupt practices act? 

No, I just didn't want to leave my oversight uncorrected.  You do want to know what the act targets, where those targeted behaviors take place, and who can be punished for violations. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are judgmental heuristics and satisficing the same thing?

No, they aren't, though they are both "less totally rational" real-world decision models.  As the text notes, judgmental heuristics are rules of thumb used without conscious awareness.  Satisficing is  a more deliberate process to choose the first "good enough" solution a person encounters.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are the stakeholder and shareholder views of corporate social responsibility debated wth the same ferocity in Europe and elsewhere?

The stakeholder view, particularly regarding government's role, is probably more pervasive in Europe than it is here.  Government assurances of privacy are generally stronger there.  As was noted in class, the general assumption used to be European companies are relatively free of the kind of financial misconduct that brought down Enron and Arthur Andersen.  This is no longer the case, as a number of major European scandals, including major ones such as the Parmalat money laundering case, have come to light over the past several years.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Sessions 20-27 clicker questions now available

Sessions 20-27 clicker questions now available

You can access the powerpoint file with the 3rd course segment's clicker questions via electronic reserve.  The file name is "20-27 Clicker questions."

If there is a one you still can't answer after consulting the text, our session slides, and your notes, feel free to ask me in class tomorrow (4/26) or via email.  (Please include the full clicker question in any email inquiry.)

...Prof. M. Fogelman

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Clarification of assignment 08 due today

Clarification of assignment 08 due today

The survey you need to answer for alternative B appears in the self-assessment exercises section.  If you can't copy the "style under stress" feedback to your discussion thread, you may either printscreen/copy it to a word processing file and attach it to your response...or you can simply summarize it in your thread.

ALTERNATIVE B: Go to the premium content site associated with the text, SELECT SELF-ASSESSMENT EXERCISES, select “13. Communication,” and then What is “Your Communication Style Under Stress?”  Answer all the questions and receive feedback on your choices.  Copy and paste that feedback in as the first part of your answers.  Then write 1-3 paragraphs either explaining why you are satisfied with your approach to high-stakes communication, or discussing how you might improve some aspect(s) of your response pattern in this type of exercise.
[Also, students doing alternative A--Twitter postings--have through Thursday 4/26 to request a two-day extension.]

Monday, April 23, 2012

Session 26 slides available

There was a delay releasing the slides for tomorrow (26 Ethics...).  They should be accessible to everyone now.  Apologies for the delay.

Things to know about Exam 3a


For students who want to speak with me, I will not be available for appointments from just past noon this Thursday until early Monday morning, 4/30.  I should have limited email access at fogelman@albany.edu through the weekend, and will also be available by phone for students who leave their phone numbers and acceptable callback times at 518/442-5545.  There are lots of available appointment times through late this Wednesday and also next Monday.

There is a single set of review slides for exams 3a (given on 5/1) and 3b (given on 5/10 along with exams 1b and 2b).  This set of slides, titled "27 Exam 3a/3b Review," is now available on ERes.  We will go over those items during class this Thursday, 4/26.

Relevant clicker questions will also be put up on ERes soon.  That file name is "20-27 Clicker items."

There is no video review for exam 3b, but audio versions of both in-class 3a/3b reviews (from 4/26) will be available via ERes.  Since there may be slight differences between what is said during the 8:45 and 10:15 in-class reviews, students ought to listen to both sound files when preparing for exam 3a and exam 3b.

(Incidentally, the review slides for exam 1b and 2b are already available, as are the review videos that go along with them.  One review video includes both 1b and 2b content, and the other has only the 2b section. You are encouraged to review these well in advance of May 10, as the University's video server may strain and degrade service when there is a huge volume of requests for access to these videos.)

                 Some information we already discussed during session 24...
 
Chester Barnard
A key reason Barnard is one of our "folk heroes" is his contribution as an early theorist regarding how we get people to do things.
What he called the "Zone of Indifference" denotes the range of authoritative requests to which a subordinate is willing to respond without subjecting the directives to critical evaluation or judgment.  In other words, he understands that in exchange for certain inducements, subordinates recognize the authority of the organization and its managers to direct their behavior in certain ways. 
Getting workers to take on tasks outside their “zone of indifference”--often what is needed for an organization to compete successfully--demands extraordinary inducements.
In order for tasks to fall within the zone, several conditions must be met  to achieve this “consent of the governed”:
The subordinate
...the subordinate must understand the directions,
...s/he should be capable of doing what’s asked,
...the task and its goals have to be consistent with the organization's purposes, and
...it must not be inconsistent with the individual worker’s personal interests and values.

Monday, April 2, 2012

BLACKBOARD ASSIGNMENTS #6, #7, #8, AND #9


BLACKBOARD ASSIGNMENTS #6, #7, #8, AND #9
Regarding Blackboard Assignments #6, #7, #8, and #9
Due April 10, 17, 24, and 26, respectively.
NOTE THAT ASSIGNMENT #9 (VERY SIMPLE!) IS DUE JUST TWO DAYS AFTER ASG08  

For your convenience as we this semester’s crush period, assignments #6, #7, #8, and #9 are posted together. They have different deadlines, as you can see, but you are welcome to complete them as early as possible. (Please do not do Asg09 TOO early.)

THERE WILL BE NO ASSIGNMENT #10; IT IS A “FREE POINT” THAT’S REALLY FREE.


BLACKBOARD ASSIGNMENT #6 (ASG06-netid)
Due TUESDAY, April 10
Lives people generally consider to be "well-lived" are often characterized by extensive community involvement, so "service learning" is a topic we've mentioned more than once in class. Though doing a project to benefit both the student and the community is an important part of students' preparation for business careers, such an activity is not easily mentored and evaluated in a survey course like Management 341. Knowing and thinking about SL, however, remains an objective of this course. In your group discussion forum, CREATE A THREAD that consists of a short report (1-3 paragraphs) covering one of three topics: (1) a service learning project you began and sustained throughout this term, (2) some such project you carried out at any time in the past, or (3) a project you will or might engage in at some time in the future. Include a discussion of the activity's benefits to you and to the community.

There is a wealth of information at the National Service-Learning Clearinghouse web site (http://www.servicelearning.org/what_is_service-learning/service-learning_is/index.php). Along with a more detailed definition and explanation of the process, you will find a glossary of terms and a list of some jobs/activities to give you ideas. Appropriate local undertakings might include work on the campus drive to increase organ and tissue donation, cooperating with the Junior Chamber of Commerce to teach economic concepts to public school students, or running a campaign to provide household or medical supplies to less privileged populations here or in developing nations. Due date: TUESDAY, April 10.

BLACKBOARD ASSIGNMENT #7
Due on TUESDAY, April 17
In the "student edition" of the premium content site, take the Self Assessment titled “Assessing Your Ethical Decision-Making Skills.” Read the feedback and write one or two sentences reporting your score and reacting to it in any way you like. Look over Session number “23 Supplemental Ethics Case Slides.”

Then go to the Manager's Hot Seat section and complete Scenario #2: Ethics: Let’s Make a Fourth Quarter Deal. Review the profiles, references, scenario, and dossier before you create your report.

Answer the questions throughout the case in your assignment posting, and add a paragraph evaluating Jason’s performance.

BLACKBOARD ASSIGNMENT #8 (ASG08-netid)
Do **EITHER** Alternative A, B or C
Due TUESDAY, April 24

For this assignment, please choose just one of these 3 alternatives:
ALTERNATIVE A:  Participate in the @bmgt Twitter Experiment.  Its objective is to facilitate online discussion and participation by students.  (STUDENTS WHO CHOOSE OTHER ASSIGNMENT #8 ALTERNATIVES ARE ALSO WELCOME TO follow and “mention” @bmgt.)

Participants will post five @bmgt “mentions” on a course topic.  Those still unfamiliar with Twitter (you are not alone) can just take a few moments to (1) create a username on http://www.twitter.com/, (2) “follow” @bmgt, (3) enter your twitter username on the signup sheet kept in the front of the room, and (4) wait a day to make sure @bmgt is following YOU.  Once your username  and @bmgt are following each other, (3) see what course discussions are on your twitter feed, (4) compose or “tweet” a message up to 140 characters long, (5) send an email to mgt341seat@yahoo.com once you have mentioned @bmgt in 5 twitter posts.  PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT EACH OF YOUR TWEETS—TOTALING AT LEAST 5 SPREAD OVER MULTIPLE DAYS—INCLUDES THE WORD “@bmgt” WITHOUT THE QUOTES.

Uses of this tool range from asking questions of the instructor, to having a discussion outside class, to letting us know if you discover some interesting management-related website or other item. Other features such as hashtags (e.g., #bmgtleadership) for specific topics may also be used.   It is preferred, but not required, that you post one or more of these tweets shortly before or DURING our class on April 10, when tweeting is invited and we will display the feed periodically during the session.

ALTERNATIVE B: Go to the premium content site associated with the text, SELECT SELF-ASSESSMENT EXERCISES, select “13. Communication,” and then What is “Your Communication Style Under Stress?”  Answer all the questions and receive feedback on your choices.  Copy and paste that feedback in as the first part of your answers.  Then write 1-3 paragraphs either explaining why you are satisfied with your approach to high-stakes communication, or discussing how you might improve some aspect(s) of your response pattern in this type of exercise.

ALTERNATIVE C: Work together with up to four other class members to present a very brief segment of a remaining class topic.  (A downsized version of the hotseat “presentation” option, this alternative is arranged and/or rehearsed with the instructor.)

ASSIGNMENT #9 (ASG09-netid)
Due THURSDAY, April 26
Write one or more paragraphs analyzing your experience in this course. Which topics did you find most (or least) helpful and interesting? Especially welcome are your opinions of the various tools and instructional techniques, including the text and other readings, regular and "second chance" exams, quizzes, short in-class videos, downloadable review slides, virtual discussion groups, the hotseat, guest speakers, clickers, and on-line contributions like this one. What changes might improve the course for the students who will follow you? React also to any new ideas mentioned in class, including the possible video replacement of additional class lectures in future semesters. Due date: *** THURSDAY***, April 26.